Tim Barlott, PhD

Lab Director | Assistant Professor



Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine

University of Alberta

2-64 Corbett Hall
Edmonton, AB



Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought.


Journal article


Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, T. Barlott
Health, 2025

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Breedt, E., Tichenor, E., McLeod, K., & Barlott, T. (2025). Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought. Health.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Breedt, Eduan, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, and T. Barlott. “Rethinking Posthumanism in Rehabilitation Science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and Decolonial Thought.” Health (2025).


MLA   Click to copy
Breedt, Eduan, et al. “Rethinking Posthumanism in Rehabilitation Science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and Decolonial Thought.” Health, 2025.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{eduan2025a,
  title = {Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought.},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Health},
  author = {Breedt, Eduan and Tichenor, Erin and McLeod, Kim and Barlott, T.}
}

Abstract

Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the "(hu)man" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the "Global North"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of dehumanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.



Tools
Translate to